Introduction
The Hughes Site (18MO1) is a Late Woodland village site. The site is located with what is now the
McKee-Beshers Wildlife Manage Area. It is
located on the floodplain of the Potomac River
and the north side of the site is flanked by a broad wetland.
Archaeological Investigations
The Hughes site was officially reported by Richard Stearns in 1940, but the site
had been known to local collectors for years prior. Amateur excavations at the site in
the 1930’s reportedly resulted in the removal of many burials and the loss of
archaeological information.
Formal investigations included site descriptions by Bill Tidwell in 1960,
inclusion in a Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Monument survey in the early
1960’s, excavations by D.R. Woodward in 1969.
The American University
archaeological field school under the direction of Richard J. Dent was conducted
at the Hughes site in 1990. An
Archaeological Society of Maryland (ASM) field school session followed in 1994. Christine Jirikowic made the site the
subject of her doctoral dissertation (1995).
A total of 42 cultural features were studied. These were predominantly classified as
pits. Some of these pits were interpreted
as being former hearths or smudge pits.
Human burials were also encountered. Two
radiocarbon samples on wood charcoal from large refuse pits (Features 7 and 22)
produced uncalibrated dates of 510 +/- 50 and 660 +/- 50, respectively, placing
site occupation in 14th and 15th centuries.
Archeobotanical Studies
Analysis was conducted on flotation and
waterscreen-recovered plant remains from 26 cultural features. Flotation samples were processed by PRAS
staff and volunteers using a modified SMAP-type machine. A single sample of waterscreen-recovered
material was also analyzed. Original soil
sample volumes are unknown. Flotation
processing of the 26 soil samples and re-processing of the single
waterscreen-recovered floral sample resulted in the recovery of 466.14 grams of
carbonized plant macro-remains from four seasons of archaeological investigation
at the site. The recovered
archeobotanical remains were both abundant and diverse, and the condition of
recovered organic remains was excellent. A wide variety of economically
important plants were represented in the analyzed assemblage: These include a predominance of wood
charcoal (dominated by hickory and white oak species); maize and beans; three
genera of native mast; wild fruit, grain and ruderal seed; and miscellaneous
plant materials including fungi, rind, monocotelydenous stem and amorphous
carbon. In addition, non-carbonized
seeds were present in 52 percent of the analyzed samples. A portion of a maize cob fragment was
hand-recovered from Feature 13 during the 2006 excavation, and it was submitted
for radiocarbon dating using the Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) technique. The c-13 adjusted age of the Feature 13
maize was 490+/- 40.
Beta Analytic Sample ID #
|
C-13 Adjusted Age
|
Cal 2 sigma low
|
Cal Median Probability
|
Cal 2 sigma high
|
242478
|
490+/-40 bp
|
1324
|
1427
|
1465
|
Calibration with Calib 5.0.1 (Stuiver and Reimer 1993)
References
Dent, Richard J. and Christine A. Jirikowic |
1990 |
Preliminary Report of Archaeological
Investigations at the Hughes Site (18MO1). Potomac River
Archaeology Survey,
Department of Anthropology, The
American
University
,
Washington
D.C.
|
|
Jirikowic, Christine A. |
1995 |
The
Hughes
Village
Site: A Late Woodland Community in
the Potomac
Piedmont
. Doctoral
Dissertation. The
American
University
,
Washington
D.C. |
|
McKnight, Justine |
2010 |
Report on the Analysis of
Flotation-recovered and Waterscreen-recovered Archeobotanical Remains
from the Hughes Site
(18MO1), Montgomery County, Maryland. Report submitted to the Potomac
River Archaeology Survey,
American University, Washington D.C. |
|
McKnight, Justine W. |
2009 |
Analysis of Flotation and waterscreen-recovered Archeobotanical Remains from the Hughes Site
(18MO1),
Montgomery County, Maryland. Maryland Archaeology Volume 45, Numbers 1 & 2, pp 29-39. |
|