Go to Gallery

Horse Care

By Sara Rivers Cofield

This section of Diagnostic Artifacts is about the tools of the stable used to groom horses and administer to their health, particularly in the 17th and 18th centuries. For the most part, this section is dominated by the metal curry comb, though even these were rare in colonial Maryland and Viginia. Many other artifacts of the stable were either organic and unlikely to survive in the archaeological record, or metal but ambiguous in form and function (Figure 1).

Metal curry combs are usually recognizable in the archaeological record thanks to their parallel iron serrated blades and angled handles that often end in decorative attachment plates (Figure 1:A). The curry comb was used as a first step in cleaning the horse’s coat. Garsault (1741: Plate VIII) illustrates a curry comb similar to those recovered in the Chesapeake (Figure 1). Many other essentials for the groom are also illustrated, so this plate and translations of its description are included in full in Figure 1. The same tools are also depicted by Gueriniere (1751:40) and Diderot and Alembert (1751-1765), suggesting that the established necessities of horse care should be relatively consistent (Figures 2-3).

Apart from the curry comb, it can be difficult to definitively attribute artifacts to the horse care category without a strong contextual argument. For example, large scissors could have many potential uses, but a pair of large scissors found in an 18th century stable are more likely to be associated with mane and tail maintenance than tailoring. Similarly, blade tools and files or rasps used for hoof maintenance might not stand out from other tools unless they are affiliated with a stable context or part of an artifact assemblage rich in other equestrian artifacts. Figures 1-3 are all provided despite their redundancy so that archaeologists can familiarize themselves with tool groupings that might end up as archaeological assemblages in areas where horses were groomed. Not every folding blade tool is likely to relate to horses, but a blade or punch tool found in context with a curry comb and a large pair of scissors warrants mention as a possible groom’s punch knife (Figure 1:V). Both context and artifact associations are key.

The rarity of colonial artifacts in this category has to do with the blasé approach to horse care adopted in the 17th- and 18th-century Chesapeake. Although saddles and bridles were imported by the thousands each year and nearly everyone owned a horse by the 1680s, little was done to care for them beyond offering some corn feed after a hard ride and setting them out to forage in the woods. Stables and horseshoeing were rare prior to the 1750s. This makes it even more important to recognize artifacts of horse care when they do appear, as that may indicate special attention to equestrian pursuits beyond the norm for the region.

Acknowledgments

The Horse Care section of Diagnostic Artifacts was funded in part by a grant from the Conservation Fund. Partners contributing collections access for this grant include Colonial Williamsburg, Historic St. Mary’s City, Preservation Virginia’s Jamestown Rediscovery, and the Viginia Department of Historic Resources.

References

Diderot, Denis, and Jean Le Rond d'Alembert

1751-1765   Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire Raisonné des Sciences: Des Arts et des Métiers. Paris: Chez Braisson, David, Le Breton, Durand. The Robert Charles Lawrence Fergusson Collection, Society of the Cincinnati, Washington, D.C.

Garsault, François Alexandre de

1774   L'Art du Bourrelier et du Sellier. Bibliothèque Nationale de France, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k10671826/f7.item.r=garsault%20sellier#, accessed November 11, 2020.

Gueriniere, François Robichon de la

1751   Ecole de Cavalerie, Contenant la Connoissance L'Instruction, et la Conservation du Cheval. Huart et Moreau Fils: Paris. Accessed in the Charles Lawrence Ferguson Collection, the library of the Society of the Cincinnati, Washington, DC.